Attitudes of First Responders towards Supervised Consumption Services for People Who Use Drugs A Cross-Sectional Survey using Moral Foundations Theory
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the degree to which first responders’ moral foundations predict attitudes toward supervised consumption services (SCS).
Methods: This cross-sectional study surveyed first responders working in Winnipeg, Canada. The survey used validated instruments to explore attitudes toward SCS using moral foundations theory (MFT). We used correlation, ANOVA, and multiple OLS and logistic mediated regression techniques to test our hypotheses. We used first responders’ professional designation (0 = firefighter, 1 = paramedic), and the Moral Foundations Questionnaire (Davies et al., 2014) as the primary predictor and mediator variables, respectively. Attitudes towards SCS (1 = strongly oppose, 5 = strongly support) served as the primary dependent variable. We transformed this dependent variable by removing responses of ‘neither oppose nor support’ to test an additional logistic mediated regression model.
Results: Paramedics (n=91) had higher levels of individualizing moral foundations and lower levels of binding moral foundations relative to firefighters (n=51). Individualizing moral foundations predicted greater support for SCS, whereas binding moral foundations predicted lower support. These two categories of moral foundations mediated relationships between first responders’ professional designation and their support for SCS.
Conclusions: Paramedics and firefighters differ in their moral foundations and level of support for SCS. These findings can inform policymakers and decision-makers in developing strategies to consider first responders as essential stakeholders in implementing SCS.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Publishing in IJOP allows authors to keep their copyright while giving IJOP unrestricted copyright permissions. Articles published in IJOP use Creative Common Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) licensing. This license requires that re-users give credit to the creator. It allows re-users to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, even for commercial purposes. Additional terms apply and can be accessed here.
Publishing in IJOP also allows authors to have contracts for non-exclusive distribution of the Journal's published version of the article, such as posting to an institutional repository or publication in a book, on the condition that the original publication in the original layout format in IJOP is retained and acknowledged.
We permit and encourage authors to post the articles they published in IJOP on their affiliated websites. This helps share the information, encourages citation in other works, and promotes scholarly discourse in the spirit of open access.
References
Alderman, J., Dollar, K. M., & Kozlowski, L. T. (2010). Understanding the origins of anger, contempt, and disgust in public health policy disputes: Applying moral psychology to harm reduction debates. Journal Of Public Health Policy, 31(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2009.52
Alper, S., & Yilmaz, O. (2019). Does an abstract mind-set increase the internal consistency of moral attitudes and strengthen individualizing foundations? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(3), 326-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619856309
Baldner, C., & Pierro, A. (2019). Motivated prejudice: The effect of need for closure on anti-immigrant attitudes in the United States and Italy and the mediating role of binding moral foundations. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 70, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.03.001
Barnett, M. D., Öz, H. C. M., & Marsden, A. D. (2018). Economic and social political ideology and homophobia: The mediating role of binding and individualizing moral foundations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(4), 1183-1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0989-2
Christie, N. C., Hsu, E., Iskiwitch, C., Iyer, R., Graham, J., Schwartz, B., & Monterosso, J. R. (2019). The moral foundations of needle exchange attitudes. Social Cognition, 37(3), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.229
City of Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service. (2021). Substance Use Totals 2016-01-01 to 2021-06-30.
Coubrough, J. (2021, April 20, 2021). Drug overdose deaths in Manitoba surge by 87% in 2020. CBC News. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/manitoba-drug-overdose-2020-wfpcbc-cbc-1.5994178
Davies, C., Sibley, C., & Liu, J. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire: Independent scale validation in a New Zealand sample. Social Psychology, 45, 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000201
Fockele, C. E., Frohe, T., McBride, O., Perlmutter, D. L., Goh, B., Williams, G., Wettemann, C., Holland, N., Finegood, B., Oliphant-Wells, T., Williams, E. C., & van Draanen, J. (2024). Harm Reduction in the Field: First Responders’ Perceptions of Opioid Overdose Interventions. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.5811/WESTJEM.18033
Giacomantonio, M., Pierro, A., Baldner, C., & Kruglanski, A. (2017). Need for closure, torture, and punishment motivations. Social Psychology, 48(6), 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000321
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral Foundations Theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2008). The Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ-30). Retrieved March 15, 2021 from https://www.MoralFoundations.org
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
Graham, J., Iyer, R., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 101(2), 366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left-right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2/3), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028573
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford
Kennedy, M. C., Karamouzian, M., & Kerr, T. (2017). Public health and public order outcomes associated with supervised drug consumption facilities: A systematic review. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep, 14(5), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-017-0363-y
Kral, A. H., & Davidson, P. J. (2017). Addressing the nation's opioid epidemic: Lessons from an unsanctioned supervised injection site in the U. S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 53(6), 919-922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.010
Kral, A. H., Lambdin, B. H., Wenger, L. D., & Davidson, P. J. (2020). Evaluation of an unsanctioned safe consumption site in the united states. The New England Journal Of Medicine, 383(6), 589-590. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2015435
Kryszajtys, D. T., Xavier, J., Rudzinski, K., Guta, A., Chan Carusone, S., & Strike, C. J. (2022). Stakeholder preferences for supervised consumption site design, staff, and ancillary services: A scoping review of feasibility studies. Drug and alcohol dependence, 230, 109179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109179
Lange, B. C. L., & Bach-Mortensen, A. M. (2019). A systematic review of stakeholder perceptions of supervised injection facilities. Drug and alcohol dependence, 197, 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.02.006
Lasaleta, J. D., Wildschut, T., & Sedikides, C. (2024). Nostalgia increases punitiveness by intensifying moral concern. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 11425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61858-x
Little, R. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198-1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2017). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation (Third ed.). SAGE https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802687
Mills, B. (2023). Morality analysis: Reducing moral backlash to public policy. Canadian Public Administration, 66(2), 230-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12522
Nilsson, A. (2023). Measurement invariance of moral foundations across population strata. J Pers Assess, 105(2), 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2074853
Pennington, M. L., Dupree, J., Coe, E., Ostiguy, W., Kimbrel, N. A., Meyer, E. C., & Gulliver, S. B. (2021). Working near a supervised injection facility: A qualitative study of perspectives of firefighter/emergency medical responders. American journal of industrial medicine, 64(4), 296-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23224
Pennington, M. L., Dupree, J., Hoffman, K., Beattie, E. H., Coe, E., Ostiguy, W., Kimbrel, N. A., Meyer, E. C., & Gulliver, S. B. (2023). First responder attitudes regarding working near a supervised injection facility: Relationship to burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction. Workplace Health & Safety, 21650799231188364. https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231188364
Perlmutter, D., Wettemann, C., Fockele, C. E., Frohe, T., Williams, W., Holland, N., Oliphant-Wells, T., Meischke, H., & van Draanen, J. (2023). “Another tool in the toolkit”—Perceptions, suggestions, and concerns of emergency service providers about the implementation of a supervised consumption site. International Journal of Drug Policy, 115, 104005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104005
Pijl, E. M., Golding, M., Gudi, S. K., Nayak, N., Serieux, J., Fries, C. J., Billings, A., Shaw, S., Rabbani, R., Laurencelle, F., Guest, C., & Mexico, J. (2025). Moral foundations underpinning attitudes toward supervised consumption services across Canada’s prairie provinces. Harm Reduction Journal, 22(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01208-w
Potier, C., Laprevote, V., Dubois-Arber, F., Cottencin, O., & Rolland, B. (2014). Supervised injection services: What has been demonstrated? A systematic literature review. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 145, 48-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.012
Sharma, A., Minh Duc, N. T., Luu Lam Thang, T., Nam, N. H., Ng, S. J., Abbas, K. S., Huy, N. T., Marušić, A., Paul, C. L., Kwok, J., Karbwang, J., de Waure, C., Drummond, F. J., Kizawa, Y., Taal, E., Vermeulen, J., Lee, G. H. M., Gyedu, A., To, K. G., Verra, M. L., Jacqz-Aigrain, É. M., Leclercq, W. K. G., Salminen, S. T., Sherbourne, C. D., Mintzes, B., Lozano, S., Tran, U. S., Matsui, M., & Karamouzian, M. (2021). A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(10), 3179-3187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1
Strike, C., Watson, T. M., Kolla, G., Penn, R., & Bayoumi, A. M. (2015). Ambivalence about supervised injection facilities among community stakeholders. Harm Reduction Journal, 12, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-015-0060-3
Taverner, R., & OACP Substance Abuse Committee. (2012). Supervised Injection Sites: A Position Paper by Ontario’s Police Leaders.
Watson, T. M., Bayoumi, A. M., Kolla, G., Penn, R., Fischer, B., Luce, J., & Strike, C. (2012). Police perceptions of supervised consumption sites (SCSs): A qualitative study. Substance Use & Misuse, 47(4), 364-374. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2011.645104
Wood, E., Kerr, T., Small, W., Li, K., Marsh, D. C., Montaner, J. S., & Tyndall, M. W. (2004). Changes in public order after the opening of a medically supervised safer injecting facility for illicit injection drug users. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 171(7), 731-734. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1040774
Zakharin, M., & Bates, T. C. (2021). Remapping the foundations of morality: Well-fitting structural model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. PLoS One, 19(5), e0258910. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258910