Private Health Information Legal Protections in Emergency Medical Services A New Jersey Case Study that Informs United States’ Protections

Main Article Content

Ryan S. Houser, MHA, MPH, MS, EMPS, NREMT

Abstract

Recent communications between counsel for an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) provider in New Jersey and the state Department of Health (DOH), Office of Emergency Medical Services (OEMS) claimed that the DOH was providing illicit access to private health information (PHI) based within the providers electronic patient care report (ePCR).  While the response from the DOH indicated that the information sharing was completed in accordance with all state and federal laws, the concerns raised by the law firm are not novel concerns.  EMS systems are often trusted by their patients to protect their PHI that is obtained as a necessity in the course of their lifesaving operations.  The collection and use of data from EMS systems nationwide is crucial to the improvement of operations, provider safety, and patient care, however there is the competing interest of protecting the privacy of patients and respecting their Constitutionally protected rights.  There are important legal and policy perspectives that should guide the prospect of personally identifiable EMS data sharing to law enforcement.

Article Details

How to Cite
Houser, R. (2022). Private Health Information Legal Protections in Emergency Medical Services: A New Jersey Case Study that Informs United States’ Protections. International Journal of Paramedicine, (1), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.56068/JTNG9057
Section
Case Reports

References

Clancy, T. (2021). NJDOH Data Sharing Return Correspondence, https://www.nj.gov/health/ems/ems-toolbox/Inquiry Response to Data Sharing.pdf.

Seplaki, T. (2018) New Jersey’s EMS Response to the Opioid Epidemic, Journal of Emergency Medical Services, https://www.jems.com/administration-and-leadership/new-jersey-s-ems-response-to-the-opioid-epidemic/.

Data Use Agreement Between NJDOH and NJDLPS. (2019). https://www.state.nj.us/health/ems/documents/ems-toolbox/DLPS%20-%20DOH%20Data%20Use%20Agreement%20(fully%20executed)%20(Nov%202019).pdf?fbclid=IwAR0n8v5yfDapybE7YePxHwFPQwJPojS0HUUX9sIONgcNOVDukwEAC-l2ajA.

N.J.S.A. 26:2K-66

45 C.F.R. §§ 160.102, 160.103; see Social Security Act § 1172(a)(3), 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-1(a)(3). see 45 C.F.R. Part 162

45 CFR 164.512(b)(1)(i)

45 CFR 164.512

Clancy, T. (2021). NJDOH Data Sharing Return Correspondence, https://www.nj.gov/health/ems/ems-toolbox/Inquiry Response to Data Sharing.pdf.

45 CFR §164.512 (a).

45 CFR 164.512(d)

45 CFR §164.514(b)

45 CFR § 164.514(b)(2)

U.S. Const. amend. IV

585 U. S. ____ (2018)

U.S. Const. amend. X

U.S. Const. amend. XIV

U.S. Const. amend. I

U.S. Const. amend. III

U.S. Const. amend. IV

U.S. Const. amend. V

U.S. Const. amend. IX

18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(2)

42 U.S.C. §§1396-1396v

N.J. Const. art. I, § 7

NJ Rev Stat § 56:8-164 (2013)

NJ Rev Stat § 56:8-163 (2013)

NJ Rev Stat § 2A:38A-3 (2020)

N.J. Stat. § 26:2H-1

N.J. Stat. § 26:1A-15

N.J. Stat. § 26:2K-67

N.J. Stat. § 26:2K-68

Smith v. Datla, 451 N.J. Super. 82, 164 A.3d 1110 (App. Div. 2017)

Lee v. Park, No. 17-1421 (3d Cir. Dec. 20, 2017)

State v. Donis, 157 N.J. 44, 723 A.2d 35 (N.J. 1998)

PAGE, WOLFBERG & WIRTH LLC. (2021) HIPAA Concerns About Releasing Information for NEMSIS. https://nemsis.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Legal-Opinion-on-Sharing-EMS-Data-NEMSIS_2021-1.pdf

45 CFR § 160.103.

PAGE, WOLFBERG & WIRTH LLC. (2021) HIPAA Concerns About Releasing Information for NEMSIS. https://nemsis.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Legal-Opinion-on-Sharing-EMS-Data-NEMSIS_2021-1.pdf

PAGE, WOLFBERG & WIRTH LLC. (2021) HIPAA Concerns About Releasing Information for NEMSIS. https://nemsis.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Legal-Opinion-on-Sharing-EMS-Data-NEMSIS_2021-1.pdf

Most read articles by the same author(s)